Chapter XIII
The legislative is supreme, but people retain the ultimate power to remove or alter it when betrayed.
38 argumentative units
- 01Legislative supremacy in functioning commonwealth
In a properly functioning commonwealth, the legislative is the one supreme power to which all others are subordinate.
- 02Legislative as fiduciary trust limited by its ends
The legislative holds only a fiduciary power given for certain ends, so it is limited by those ends and forfeits its trust when neglecting or opposing them.
- 03Power reverts to people upon breach of trust
When the legislative breaches its trust, power devolves back to the people who gave it, and they may place it anew where they see fit.
- 04People retain perpetual supreme power of self-preservation
The community perpetually retains a supreme power to save itself from any threats, including from its own legislators, by removing those who act against liberties and properties.
- 05Inalienable right to self-preservation
No man or society can surrender their preservation or means of it to another's absolute will; they always retain the right to resist being brought into slavery.
- 06Right to remove those who invade fundamental law of self-preservation
People entered society to preserve the fundamental law of self-preservation, and have the right to remove those who invade this unalterable law.
- 07Community supremacy exists only outside constitutional order
The people can be called supreme in their ultimate power, but only when government is dissolved, not as considered under any form of government.
- 08Legislative supremacy during subsistence of government
While government exists, the legislative is supreme because it alone has the power to make laws for all members of society and prescribe rules and punishments.
- 09Executive with legislative share may be called supreme
In some commonwealths where the executive is a single person with a share in the legislative, that person may be called supreme in the sense of having supreme execution, though not supreme law-making power.
- 10Executive is representative of public will, not supreme sovereign
Oaths are taken not to the executive as supreme legislator but as executor of law; when he violates law and acts by private will, he loses all right to obedience.
- 11Executive has no will or power except what law grants
The executive has no will or power except that given by law, and when he quits the public representation and acts privately, he degrades to a private person without authority.
- 12Executive without legislative share is visibly subordinate
An executive power not vested in someone with legislative authority is clearly subordinate and accountable to the legislative and may be changed at pleasure.
- 13Executive with legislative share not truly subordinate
When the executive has a share in the legislative and no distinct superior to whom he must answer, he is only subordinate to the extent he consents, which will be very little.
- 14All ministerial powers derive from and are accountable to others
All other ministerial and subordinate powers in a commonwealth have authority only by positive grant and commission, and are accountable to some other power.
- 15Legislative need not always be in session
The legislative does not need to be constantly in being since there is not always need for new laws, only for execution of existing ones.
- 16Executive power must constantly exist
The executive power must always exist because there is a constant need to execute the laws that have been made.
- 17Legislative retains power to resume execution from executive
The legislative retains the power to resume execution of laws from the executive's hands and to punish maladministration against the laws.
- 18Both federative and executive powers are subordinate to legislative
Both the federative power and executive power are ministerial and subordinate to the legislative, which is supreme in a constituted commonwealth.
- 19Legislative assembly times determined by constitution or self-adjournment
The legislative may assemble and exercise its power at times appointed by the original constitution, by their own adjournment, or whenever they please if no time is prescribed.
- 20Representatives chosen periodically return to ordinary subject status
When the legislature consists of representatives chosen for a time who later return to ordinary status with no legislative share except upon new election, the power of choosing must be exercised by the people.
- 21Executive power typically convokes the legislative
The power of convoking the legislative is ordinarily placed in the executive, with limitations either by fixed constitutional intervals or by executive prudence to call them when public needs require.
- 22Executive use of force to prevent legislative meeting is state of war
If the executive uses force to prevent the legislative from meeting when required by constitution or public exigency, this is a state of war and the people have the right to reinstate their legislative.
- 23Force without authority may be opposed by force
Force without authority puts the aggressor in a state of war and makes opposing force legitimate; the true remedy for unlawful force is to oppose it with force.
- 24Executive power to assemble legislature is fiduciary trust
The executive's power to assemble and dismiss the legislature is a fiduciary trust placed in him for the people's safety, not a mark of superiority.
- 25Fixed rules cannot account for future contingencies
Because future events are unknowable and human affairs constantly change, the framers could not set fixed periods for legislative assemblies that would suit all times.
- 26Frequent legislative meetings would burden the people
Constant and long legislative sessions without necessity would be burdensome and produce dangerous inconveniences, yet emergencies sometimes require quick convening.
- 27Executive best positioned to exercise convocation prudence
The executive, who is always present and must watch over the public good, is the most appropriate person to be entrusted with deciding when to convene the legislature.
- 28Executive prerogative of convocation does not establish superiority
Though the executive has the prerogative to convoke and dissolve the legislature, this power is exercised only for public weal, not arbitrary pleasure, and does not make him superior.
- 29Time causes representation to become unequal and disproportionate
Over time, populations and wealth shift, causing the representation in government to become very unequal, with some depopulated towns sending as many representatives as populous counties.
- 30Inequality of representation appears incurable under current theory
Because the legislative constitution is the original supreme act depending wholly on the people, and no inferior power can alter it, this inequality seems incapable of remedy once government is constituted.
- 31Welfare of people is supreme and fundamental law
The principle that the welfare of the people is the supreme law is so just and fundamental that one who follows it sincerely cannot dangerously err.
- 32Executive may correct unequal representation through prerogative
The executive, using prerogative power to correct representation by reason rather than custom, restores the true legislative order and rectifies disorders caused by time's succession.
- 33People will approve restoration of fair and equal representation
Whoever brings representation nearest to fair and equal terms will have the people's consent and approbation, being an undoubted friend to the government.
- 34Prerogative is power to provide public good in unforeseen cases
Prerogative is the power in the prince's hands to provide for the public good in cases that cannot be safely directed by certain and unalterable laws.
- 35Actions manifestly for public good and true foundations are just prerogative
Whatever is done manifestly for the people's good and for establishing government on true foundations is and always will be just prerogative.
- 36New corporations and representatives may be created as circumstances warrant
The power to erect new corporations and representatives presupposes that representation may change over time, with some places gaining or losing the right based on their significance.
- 37Change is justified if it prevents injury and oppression
A change in representation is wrong only if it tends to injure or oppress the people or set up one part above others; changes for societal advantage are always justified.
- 38Just change of representation constitutes the will and act of society
When people choose representatives on just and equal measures suitable to the original frame of government, this is the society's will and act regardless of who initiated it.