Chapter I
Locke establishes the true origin and extent of civil government through reason.
7 argumentative units
- 01First premise: Adam had no natural authority
Locke asserts that Adam possessed neither natural paternal authority nor divine grant over his children or the world, contrary to absolutist claims.
- 02Second premise: Heirs had no inherited right
Even if Adam possessed authority, his heirs would have no legitimate right to inherit it.
- 03Third premise: Succession cannot be determined
Without a law of nature or divine law specifying the rightful heir, the right of succession to rule could never be certainly established.
- 04Fourth premise: Knowledge of succession is lost
The historical knowledge of which line is Adam's eldest has been irretrievably lost, so no one can claim precedence by inheritance.
- 05Conclusion: Filmer's theory must be rejected
Current rulers cannot derive any legitimate authority from Adam's dominion, so one must reject Filmer's doctrine and find an alternative origin of political power.
- 06Introduction to defining political power
Locke proposes to define political power in order to distinguish it from paternal, marital, and other private powers that may exist in the same person.
- 07Formal definition of political power
Political power is the right to make laws with penalties including death, employ the community's force in execution, defend the commonwealth, and all this solely for the public good.