Chapter XXI
Candide and Martin approach France, debating human nature and happiness.
15 argumentative units
- 01Martin's pessimistic characterization of France
Martin describes the people of France across different provinces as variously foolish, cunning, weak, or affectedly witty, with their principal occupations being love, slander, and nonsense.
- 02Martin's negative personal experience in Paris
Martin recounts being robbed by pickpockets, falsely imprisoned as a criminal, and having to work as a press corrector to escape the chaotic city, while reluctantly acknowledging rumors of polite society there.
- 03Candide's refusal to visit France
Candide declares he has no interest in seeing France because his only desire since leaving El Dorado is to reunite with Cunegonde in Venice.
- 04Martin's agreement to accompany Candide
Martin agrees to travel with Candide everywhere because, lacking money himself, he benefits from Candide's wealth.
- 05Candide's question about the earth's cosmological origin
Candide asks Martin whether he believes the earth was originally a sea, as claimed in a book belonging to the captain.
- 06Martin's rejection of cosmological theories
Martin dismisses the theory about the earth's origin and disavows belief in other recent published theories.
- 07Candide's question about the world's purpose
Candide asks what purpose the world was formed for if not as a former sea.
- 08Martin's nihilistic answer about the world's purpose
Martin answers that the world exists only to torment mankind.
- 09Candide's question about the Oreillohs' love for monkeys
Candide asks whether Martin finds it surprising that the Oreillohs girls had romantic passion for monkeys.
- 10Martin's claim of being inured to extraordinary phenomena
Martin states he is not surprised because he has witnessed so many extraordinary things that surprise is no longer possible for him.
- 11Candide's question about the constancy of human vice
Candide asks Martin whether humans have always possessed all their various vices—whether they have perpetually been liars, thieves, murderers, and so forth.
- 12Martin's analogy between hawks and men
Martin responds by asking whether hawks have always eaten pigeons, implying that human nature is as naturally unchanging as animal nature.
- 13Candide's acceptance of the animal predation premise
Candide confirms that hawks have indeed always preyed on pigeons.
- 14Martin's application of the analogy to human nature
Martin concludes that if hawks have always maintained their predatory character, humans should similarly be expected to have always retained their vicious nature.
- 15Candide's objection based on human free will
Candide begins to object by pointing out the crucial difference between humans and animals: humans possess free will.